Mesa is a 3-D graphics library with an API which is very similar to that of OpenGL.*
Mesa is a 3-D graphics library with an API which is very similar to
that of OpenGL.* To the extent that Mesa utilizes the OpenGL command
syntax or state machine, it is being used with authorization from
Silicon Graphics, Inc.(SGI). However, the author does not possess an
OpenGL license from SGI, and makes no claim that Mesa is in any way a
compatible replacement for OpenGL or associated with SGI. Those who
want a licensed implementation of OpenGL should contact a licensed
vendor.
Please do not refer to the library as MesaGL (for legal reasons). It's
just Mesa or The Mesa 3-D graphics library.
* OpenGL is a trademark of Silicon Graphics Incorporated.
- Devel package for openSUSE:Factory
-
78
derived packages
- Links to openSUSE:Factory / Mesa
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout X11:XOrg/Mesa && cd $_
- Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files (show merged sources derived from linked package)
Filename | Size | Changed |
---|---|---|
Mesa-rpmlintrc | 0000000523 523 Bytes | about 5 years |
Mesa.changes | 0000306832 300 KB | 8 days |
Mesa.keyring | 0000398858 390 KB | almost 3 years |
Mesa.spec | 0000037277 36.4 KB | 8 days |
README.updates | 0000000413 413 Bytes | about 16 years |
U_ReturnME.patch | 0000002374 2.32 KB | about 1 month |
U_fix-mpeg1_2-decode-mesa-20.2.patch | 0000000658 658 Bytes | 3 months |
U_glx-Remove-pointless-GLX_INTEL_swap_event-parano |
0000002636 2.57 KB | 8 days |
U_glx-fix-indirect-initialization-crash.patch | 0000001783 1.74 KB | 20 days |
_constraints | 0000000569 569 Bytes | 4 months |
_link | 0000000139 139 Bytes | 6 days |
_multibuild | 0000000056 56 Bytes | 11 months |
baselibs.conf | 0000004359 4.26 KB | 3 months |
manual-pages.tar.bz2 | 0000137685 134 KB | over 16 years |
mesa-23.0.0.tar.xz | 0017492236 16.7 MB | 27 days |
mesa-23.0.0.tar.xz.sig | 0000000119 119 Bytes | 27 days |
n_add-Mesa-headers-again.patch | 0000000474 474 Bytes | over 2 years |
n_drirc-disable-rgb10-for-chromium-on-amd.patch | 0000001213 1.18 KB | 27 days |
n_no-sse2-on-ix86-except-for-intel-drivers.patch | 0000001393 1.36 KB | 27 days |
n_stop-iris-flicker.patch | 0000000948 948 Bytes | 27 days |
u_dep_xcb.patch | 0000001171 1.14 KB | 27 days |
u_fix-build-on-ppc64le.patch | 0000001560 1.52 KB | 27 days |
Comments 56
akilgus wrote about 6 years ago
Is there any chance to get the build for 13.2 fixed in this repository? There seems to be no unresolvable technical show stopper: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?project=home%3Aaevseev&package=Mesa
sndirsch wrote about 6 years ago
Of course this would be possible despite openSUSE 13.2 will be out of support pretty soon. Seems you removed U_cso-don-t-release-sampler-states-that-are-bound.patch. Not sure why? For the additional patch fix-missing-memfd-header.patch, please follow our X11:XOrg patch guidelines. After resolving this you can open a submitrequest against X11:XOrg. Thanks!
akilgus wrote about 6 years ago
I did neither remove anything nor add any patch - you seem to mistake me for the maintainer of the repository I mentioned. My motivation for asking is simply not to let increase the number of repositories I use (currently 49 and counting) any further by adding another "home/" repository for packages at least theoretically already available in a repository in use.
sndirsch wrote about 6 years ago
Indeed I assumed this would be your repository.
akilgus wrote about 6 years ago
Thanks for having revivified providing updated packages for 13.2.
alvarex wrote almost 6 years ago
will this bump to version 17.1?
avindra wrote over 5 years ago
17.2.3 release is cut https://github.com/mesa3d/mesa/releases/tag/mesa-17.2.3
blachner wrote about 5 years ago
Could the build be enabled for openSUSE Leap 42.3 to get a Mesa 18 version for this distribution?
sndirsch wrote about 5 years ago
Currently it's not possible, since llvm cannot be built for openSUSE 42.3. :-(
blachner wrote about 5 years ago
OK. Thank you for your answer.
Do you think it would be possible to build it anytime soon for openSUSE Leap 42.3? Or will it stay at the current offered Mesa version for this distribution?
sndirsch wrote about 5 years ago
I can't say. A collegue is/was working on this. But it has no high priority.
mimi_vx wrote about 5 years ago
probably not, Newer versions of Mesa also need new version of Wayland libs and protocols. + Bonus six months after the release of Leap 15.0, 42.3 Leap will EOL
sndirsch wrote about 5 years ago
Ok. Build against Leap 42.3 is enabled in X11:XOrg again. Looks good so far.
_nobody_ wrote over 4 years ago
This comment has been deleted
Delete comment?
Please confirm deletion of comment
sndirsch wrote over 4 years ago
On my TODO list ...
_nobody_ wrote over 4 years ago
This comment has been deleted
Delete comment?
Please confirm deletion of comment
sndirsch wrote over 4 years ago
Looks like this came in with some autocommit magic crap back from factory. :-(
r773 | buildservice-autocommit | 2018-09-18 09:37:23 | 0273904b5d3bac6a229ef7bd5bf12077 | unknown | rq635013
baserev update by copy to link target
r772 | buildservice-autocommit | 2018-09-11 15:12:48 | 04666deac08cb6669a4cfb681e18d754 | unknown | rq631796
baserev update by copy to link target
Fortunately Tobias Klausmann brought this back, now to 18.2.1 ...
KhazAkar wrote over 4 years ago
Please add GALLIUM_HUD support for intel drivers
sndirsch wrote over 4 years ago
Intel drivers aren't using gallium at the moment. Not sure what you mean here.
Guillaume_G wrote about 4 years ago
Please check/fix %arm and aarch64 before pushing to Factory
_nobody_ wrote almost 4 years ago
This comment has been deleted
Delete comment?
Please confirm deletion of comment
sndirsch wrote almost 4 years ago
@ryanbach Already checked in ... :-)
_nobody_ wrote almost 4 years ago
This comment has been deleted
Delete comment?
Please confirm deletion of comment
sndirsch wrote almost 4 years ago
done. :-)
_nobody_ wrote over 3 years ago
This comment has been deleted
Delete comment?
Please confirm deletion of comment
sndirsch wrote over 3 years ago
Thanks. Sounds good! An appropriate submitrequest would be appreciated and accepted. ;-)
akilgus wrote about 3 years ago
Is the current (2020-01-09) state of Mesa in this repo supposed to work? There's a mixture of 19.3.1 (e.g. Mesa) and 19.2.6 (e.g. Mesa-dri) packages online - I had to go back to Leap 15.1's Mesa 18.3.2 to get the GUI up and running …
sndirsch wrote about 3 years ago
Thanks. Indeed build of Mesa-driver on Leap 15.1/15.2 fails due to llvm version < 8. I'm trying to build llvm8 for Leap 15.1/15.2. Will take some time though ...
akilgus wrote about 3 years ago
No need to hurry (at least not because of me). Just wanted to know if I broke something on my side or if the repo's the one to blame … ;)
sndirsch wrote about 3 years ago
It has been the Mesa update to 19.3.1 .... which now needs llvm 8 ...
sndirsch wrote about 3 years ago
@akilgus Meanwhile build against Leap 15.0/15.1 fixed. :-)
akilgus wrote about 3 years ago
Thanks for your work. I'll give the new packages a try within the coming days.
_nobody_ wrote almost 3 years ago
This comment has been deleted
Delete comment?
Please confirm deletion of comment
sndirsch wrote almost 3 years ago
Already on my TODO list. ;-)
zakhrov wrote over 2 years ago
Can we enable the MESA_VK_DEVICE_SELECT layer and the Mesa Vulkan Overlay layer for the Tumbleweed package?
sndirsch wrote over 2 years ago
Hmm. Could you come up with a concrete proposal for the package, preferrably a submit request? My guess is that I need to add -Dvulkan-device-select-layer=true as option for meson in specfile, but since you're apparently an expert here, it would be good if you could come up with something well tested.
zakhrov wrote over 2 years ago
I have branched the package and tried out some changes. They are in my obs repository here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:zakhrov:Mesa/Mesa It adds 2 packages. Mesa-vulkan-overlay and Mesa-vulkan-device-select which has the libraries and JSON files
zakhrov wrote over 2 years ago
I have submitted a request for it
ukbeast89 wrote almost 2 years ago
I've tried updating to 21.0.1.
meson.build:21:0: ERROR: Value classic is not boolean (true or false)
sndirsch wrote almost 2 years ago
Valid values for -Dosmesa have changed. And a lot more. Mesa update won't be trivial this time. I tried for about two hours, but gave up then. May take several days to update Mesa this time. :-(
ukbeast89 wrote almost 2 years ago
-Dosmesa=classic \
is no longer being used. Removed that option and now noticeERROR: Options "swrast" are not in allowed choices: "auto, i915, i965, r100, r200, nouveau"
Looks like mesa has removed it https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Mesa-Kills-SWRAST
sp1rit wrote over 1 year ago
n_drirc-disable-rgb10-for-chromium-on-amd.patch is unneeded as it got fixed in gstreamer a few months ago:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer-vaapi/-/merge_requests/410
sndirsch wrote over 1 year ago
Thanks. Done. See my latest changelog entry for Mesa sources.
BehzadA wrote over 1 year ago
The Crocus driver(Intel 965G(Gen4)-Haswell(Gen7.5 and also Cherryview) Gallium-based driver) has been forgotten in the Spec files.
//-----------------------------------------
%ifarch %{ix86} x86_64
-Ddri-drivers=i915,i965,nouveau,r100,r200 \
-Dgallium-drivers=r300,r600,radeonsi,nouveau,swrast,svga,virgl,iris,crocus \
//------------------------------------------
Currently, the Crocus isn't enabled by default in Mesa 21.2
//------------------------------------------
mesa/meson_options.txt
option( 'prefer-crocus', type : 'boolean', value : false, description : 'Prefer new crocus driver over older i965 driver for gen4-7' )
//---------------------------------------
And users who want to use the Crocus driver should set the 'MESA_LOADER_DRIVER_OVERRIDE=crocus' environment variable, And if there is a problem with video hardware acceleration(vaapi driver), Should set the 'LIBVA_DRIVER_NAME=i965'
sndirsch wrote over 1 year ago
Enabled. But currently build on %ix86 fails. This is the bigger issue right now.
BehzadA wrote over 1 year ago
Thanks
I'm not a Mesa contributor, But I took a quick look and personally suspected GCC11.x(This is just a guess) because build with GCC7.x is successful(Leap_15.2 Mesa) but fails with GCC11.x, And also I remembered some opened issues on Mesa Gitlab that seems to be related to the GCC11
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/5069 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/5067 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/5068
sndirsch wrote over 1 year ago
Thanks. I'm just wondering why Mesa 21.1.6 can still be built on %ix86 with GCC11 in place. So it needs to be related to changes in Mesa 21.2.0.
BehzadA wrote over 1 year ago
The issue seems to be solved; Please checks Spec and conf files in my branch. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:BehzadA:branches:X11:XOrg/Mesa Based on https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:tobijk:X11:XOrg:Unstable/Mesa Modified by me and need to be reviewed and also "Mesa-dri-kmsro" build is enabled.
sndirsch wrote over 1 year ago
Thanks! I've fixed the build against %ix86 now by removing "-flto=auto" from cpp flags.
BehzadA wrote about 1 year ago
The i915g driver(Intel Gen3 Gallium-based driver) has been forgotten in the Spec files.
%ifarch %{ix86} x86_64
-Ddri-drivers= \
-Dgallium-drivers=r300,r600,radeonsi,nouveau,swrast,svga,virgl,iris,crocus,i915 \
BehzadA wrote about 1 year ago
Also to support legacy platforms that only have classic drivers and Swrast driver
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/10557 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/8069/
sndirsch wrote about 1 year ago
I'm not aware of an (open)SUSE platform, which only supported classic drivers and swrast drivers. I don't want to readd no longer upstream supported classic drivers.
sndirsch wrote about 1 year ago
I wasn't aware of the i915 Gallium driver for Intel Gen3 GPUs. I'll try to add it.
nuklly wrote 7 months ago
Can we enable zink driver in this repo?
sndirsch wrote 7 months ago
Just accepted your submit request. :-)
alois wrote 6 months ago
@sndirsch is this a problem https://www.phoronix.com/news/Fedora-Disable-Bad-VA-API ?