Request 393914 (accepted)

Overview

Request 393914 accepted

conkeror is firefox/xulrunner based web browser with UI and controls reworked to mimic Emacs

Created by sleep_walker about 8 years ago
In state accepted

Submit conkeror

Comments for request 393914 0

Request History

sleep_walker created request about 8 years ago

conkeror is firefox/xulrunner based web browser with UI and controls reworked to mimic Emacs

factory-auto added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer about 8 years ago

Please review build success

factory-auto accepted review about 8 years ago

Check script succeeded

factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer about 8 years ago

Please review sources

licensedigger added legal-team as a reviewer about 8 years ago

new_package: 1.0

licensedigger accepted review about 8 years ago

mlin7442 added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:44 as a reviewer about 8 years ago

Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:44"

mlin7442 accepted review about 8 years ago

Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:44

factory-repo-checker accepted review about 8 years ago

Builds for repo mozilla:Factory/openSUSE_Factory

jengelh accepted review about 8 years ago

dec16180 declined review almost 8 years ago

Please change license to 'MPL-1.1 or GPL-2.0+ or LPGL-2.1+'. I could not find any GPL-2.0 only files in the package.

dec16180 declined request almost 8 years ago

Please change license to 'MPL-1.1 or GPL-2.0+ or LPGL-2.1+'. I could not find any GPL-2.0 only files in the package.

sleep_walker reopened request almost 8 years ago

@dec16180 thanks for your time on this package. I have a bit problem with your reasoning. I can change the license in spec file but what value it will have if it collides with the license in COPYING file?

"I could not find any GPL-2.0 only files in the package." - I see no GPL-2.0+ nor LGPL-2.1+ licensed file either. If any license restrictions are mentioned, they say to have a look into COPYING file.

"Unless otherwise stated, use, modification, and distribution are subject to the
terms of the Mozilla Public License Version 1.1. Alternatively, (at your
option) use, modification, and distribution are instead subject to the terms of
either the GNU General Public License Version 2 or the GNU Lesser General Public
License Version 2.1. The text of these licenses follows.
..."

So, I could not find any files which are licensed differently from `MPL-1.1 or GPL-2.0 or LGPL-2.1'. Could you please be more verbose on the reasons for rejection?

Thanks in advance.